Volume 3, Number 4 (Winter 2017)                   JECH 2017, 3(4): 24-30 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Memarzadeh M, Khodabakhshi-koolaee A, Khatiban M. The Effect of Training the Nine Enneagram Personality Types on Spouse Selection Criteria and Marital Attitude of Single Girls. JECH. 2017; 3 (4) :24-30
URL: http://jech.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-244-en.html

1- MSc, Department of Counseling, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Branch, Iran.
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology and Education, Faculty of Humanities, Khatam University, Tehran, Iran. , anna_khodabakhshi@yahoo.com
3- Associate Professor, Mother & Child Care Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Abstract:   (865 Views)
Background and Objectives: The foundation of any society is built upon marriage and starting a family. However, marriage is a complex and challenging issue, success in which is hinged upon various factors such as attitude towards marriage. This study was carried out to evaluate the effect of training the 9 Enneagram personality types on spouse selection criteria and attitude towards marriage in single grils.
Materials and Methods: This quasi-experimental study with a pretest-posttest design and control group was performed on all the third-grade high school female students in the District 14 of Tehran, Iran, during 2015-16 academic calendar. The subjects were selected through multistage cluster sampling from two schools in the mentioned district. A total of 30 students were selected and randomly divided into control and experimental groups. The data collection tools consisted Preference Criteria of Spouse Selection Inventory (PCSSI) and Marital Attitude Scale (MAS). The intervention group received ten 90-minute sessions (once a week). To analyze the data, analysis of covariance was run in SPSS, version 22.
Results: After the intervention, there was a significant difference between the intervention and control groups in terms of overall attitude and cynical attitude towards marriage and the general, procedural, and content spouse selection criteria (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to idealistic attitude towards marriage at the post-intervention stage (P>0.05).
Conclusions: According to the results, training the 9 Enneagram personality types was effective in marital attitude and spouse selection criteria of girls.
 
Full-Text [PDF 857 kb]   (58 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research Article | Subject: Special
Received: 2017/01/23 | Accepted: 2017/03/14

References
1. Brateen EB, Rosen LA. Development and validation of the marital attitude scale. J Divorce Remarriage. 1998;29(3-4):83-91.
2. Trent K, South SJ. Sociodemographic status, parental background childhood family structure, andattitudes towards family formation. J Marriage Fam. 1992;54(2):427-39.
3. Mikulincer M, Shaver PR. Attachment in adulthood: structure, dynamics, and change. New York: The Guilford Press; 2007. P. 47-9.
4. Risch SC, Jodl KM, Eccles JS. Role of the father-adolescent relationship in shaping adolescent’sattitude toward divorce. J Marriage Fam. 2004;66(1):46-58.
5. Freeman H, Brown BB. Primary attachment to parents and peers during adolescence, differences byattachment style. J Youth Adolesc. 2001;30(6):653-74.
6. Segrin C, Talor ME, Altman J. Social cognitive mediators and relational outcomes associated withparental divorce. J Soc Personal Relation. 2005;22(3):361-77.
7. Sanai Zaker B. Measures of family and marriage. Tehran: Publishing Institute Mission; 2000. [Persian]
8. Ebrahimi M. Today attitude about the issue and how marriage. Shiraz: Pejman Press; 2014. [Persian]
9. Huston TL, Houts RM. The psychological infrastructure of courtship and marriage: the role of personality and compatibility in romantic relationships. In: Bradbury TN, Weiss RL, editors. The developmental course of marital dysfunction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1998. P. 114-51.
10. Caughlin JP, Huston TL, Houts RM. How does personality matter in marriage? An examination of trait anxiety, interpersonal negativity, and marital satisfaction. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000;78(2):326-36. [PubMed]
11. Hoseinian S, Azimipour P, Karami A, Yazdi SM, Keshavarz GG. Study of the psychometrical features of enneagram personality types. Quart J Career Organizat Counsel. 2012;12(4):125-44. [Persian]
12. Riso DR, Hudson R. Discovering your personality type: the essential introduction to the enneagram. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt; 2003.
13. Bartlett C. The enneagram field guide: notes on using the enneagram in counseling, therapy, and personal growth. Portland, Oregon: Enneagram Consortium; 2003.
14. Riso DR, Hudson R. Wisdom of the enneagram. New York: Publisher Bantam; 1999.
15. Nilforoshan P, Navidian A, Abedi A. Studying the psychometric properties of marital attitude scale. Iran J Psych Nurs. 2013;15(1):35-47. [Persian]
16. Khodabakhshi Kolaei A, Solgi A, Mossallanejad L, Khodabakhsh Koharlaei S. Comparison of “Intimacy and marital adjustment” in two styles of marriage of family-arranged and couple–matching agencies. Counsel Res Dev. 2011;11(44):93-106. [Persian]
17. Arthur KB. Attachment styles and enneagram types: development and testing of an integrated typology for use in marriage and family therapy. [Doctor Dissertation]. Virginia: Philosophy in Human Development, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Virginia; 2008.
18. Eckstein D. The couple’s Enneagram questionnaire (CEQ). Fam J. 2002;10(1):101-8.
19. Donnellan MB, Conger RD, Bryant CM. Erratum to “The big five and enduring marriages. J Res Personal. 2005;39(1):206-7.
20. Kashi G. The effect of training enneagram theory on marital satisfaction and self-esteem housewives in Tehran. [Master Thesis]. Tehran, Iran: Psychology of Al-Zahra University; 2010. [Persian]
21. Arthur K, Allen K. The nature of love: understanding the enneagram types as nine expressions of attachment. Enneagram J. 2010;3(1):22-6.
22. Greitemeyer T. What do men and women want in a partner? Are educated partners always more desirable? J Exper Soc Psychol. 2007;43(2):180-94.
23. Sharp EA, Ganong LH. Raising awareness about marital expectations: are unrealistic beliefs changed by integrative teaching? Fam Relations. 2000;49(1):71-6.
24. Carroll JS, Doherty WJ. Evaluating the effectiveness of premarital prevention programs: a meta-analytic review of outcome research. Fam Relations. 2003;52(2):105-18.
25. Segrin C, Nabi RL. Does television viewing cultivate unrealistic expectations about marriage? J Commun. 2002;52(2):247-63.
26. McGeorge CR, Carlson TS. Premarital education: an assessment of program efficacy. Contemp Fam Ther. 2006;28(1):165-90.
27. Khaniki ZM. The effect of pre-marital and marital expectations based on sustainable family plan for mate selection criteria for female high school students. [Master Dissertations]. Masshad, Iran: Department of Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad; 2013. [Persian]
28. Bland AM. The enneagram: a review of the empirical and transformational literature. J Humanistic Counsel Educ Dev. 2010;49(1):16-31.
29. Decuyper M, De Bolle M, De Fruyt F. Personality similarity, perceptual accuracy, and relationship satisfaction in dating and married couples. Personal Relationships. 2012;19(1):128-45.
30. Veisi A. The study of effectiveness of image relationship therapy on marriage satisfaction. Know Res Appl Psychol. 2010;11(42):89-102. [Persian]
31. The enneagram institute. Quick Enneagram Sorting Test (quest). Available at: URL: https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/16227149/quest-quick-enneagram-sorting-test-enneagram-institute; 2010.
32. Larson JH. The marriage quiz: college students' beliefs in selected myths about marriage. Fam Relations. 1988;37(1):3-11.
33. Khamse A. Premarital education: a practical guide for young couples. Tehran: The University of Al-Zahra; 2003 (Persian)
34. Scott SA. An analysis of the validity of the enneagram. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Virginia: The College of William and Mary; 2011.
35. Duffey T, Haberstroh S. Helping couples reconnect: developing relational competencies and expanding worldviews using the enneagram personality typology. Ideas Res VISTAS. 2011;11:25.
36. Godin J. The effect of the enneagram on psychological well–being and unconditional self–acceptance of young adults. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Ames, USA: Iowa State University; 2010.
37. Ahmadi KH, Azad Marzabady E, Mollazamani A. The survey of marital adjustment in Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (Sepah) Staff. J Military Med. 2005;7(2):141-52. [Persian]
38. Riso DR, Hudson R. The riso-hudson enneagram type indicator. NewYork: The Enneagram Institute; 2010.
39. Hendrati F. Improving marital harmony for husband–wife of different cultures in the early marriage years. Int J Soc Local Economic Govern. 2015;1(2):147-52.
40. Carpenter DG. Resonating personality types for couples: an enneagram application for predicting marital satisfaction. [Doctor Dissetration]. Minnesota, USA: Philosophy in Psychology, Walden University; 2015.
41. Yilmz ED, Gencer AG. From ennegram to nine types temperament model: a proposal. Educ Sci. 2014;39(173):393-415.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or email:
Write the security code in the box

Send email to the article author


© 2015 All Rights Reserved | J Educ Community Health

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb