Volume 7, Issue 1 (March 2020)                   J Educ Community Health 2020, 7(1): 51-58 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Taghavifard M T, Hanafizadeh P, Bamdad-Soofi J, Yoosefvand A. Model of Acceptance of E-Health Services. J Educ Community Health. 2020; 7 (1) :51-58
URL: http://jech.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-768-en.html
1- Industrial Management Department, Management & Accounting Faculty, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Industrial Management Department, Management & Accounting Faculty, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran. , ayoosefvand@gmail.com
Abstract:   (200 Views)
Aims: Understanding the factors that underpin the adoption of new healthcare electronic systems and services is of great importance. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to provide the model of acceptance of electronic health services by patients.
Instruments & Methods: This descriptive-correlational study was conducted on 357 patients in Tehran hospitals during 2018-2019. The subjects were selected by convenience sampling method and completed a questionnaire including demographic information and the main model structural components (audience, cerebral process, and conduit). SPSS 22 software was used for descriptive analysis of data and partial least squares method and Smart PLS 3.2.8 software were used to verify the conceptual model.
Findings: The influence of factors related to receiver of health services or audience (t=9.955), factors related to cerebral process (t=5.206) and also, factors related to conduit (t=3.350) were significant on acceptance of e-health services (p<0.05). Therefore, all relationships between model variables were confirmed.
Conclusion: The provided model of acceptance of e-health services is confirmed and based on this, one can predict the effective factors in determining the acceptance of e-health services.
Type of Study: Research Article | Subject: General
Received: 2019/07/10 | Accepted: 2019/11/9

References
1. Domenichiello M. State of the art in adoption of e-health services in Italy in the context of European :union: E-government strategies. Procedia Econ Finance. 2015;23:1110-8. [Full text]
2. Rust RT, Kannan PK. E-service: a new paradigm for business in the electronic environment. Commun ACM. 2003;46(6):36-42. [Full text]
3. Mou J, Shin DH, Cohen JF. Trust and risk in consumer acceptance of e-services. Electron Commerce Res. 2017;17(2):255-88. [Full text]
4. Esmaeilzadeh P, Sambasivan M, Kumar N, Nezakhati H. Adoption of technology applications in healthcare: the influence of attitude toward knowledge sharing on technology acceptance in a hospital. In: Kim TH, Adeli H, Ma J, Fang W, Kang BH, Park B, et al., editors. International Conference on U-and E-Service, Science and Technology, U- and E-Service, Science and Technology; 2011 Dec 8-10; Jeju Island, Korea. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2011. [Full text]
5. Featherman MS, Pavlou PA. Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2003;59(4):451-74. [Full text]
6. Adler-Milstein J, Holmgren AJ, Kralovec P, Worzala C, Searcy T, Patel V. Electronic health record adoption in US hospitals: the emergence of a digital "advanced use" divide. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017;24(6):1142-8. [PubMed]
7. Aarts J, Gorman P. IT in health care: sociotechnical approaches "to err is system". Int J Med Inform. 2007;76 (Suppl 1):S1-3. [PubMed]
8. Giuse DA, Kuhn KA. Health information systems challenges: the Heidelberg conference and the future. Int J Med Inform. 2003;69(2-3):105-14. [PubMed]
9. Heeks R. Development 2.0: the IT enabled transformation of international development. Commun ACM. 2010;53(4):22-4. [Full text]
10. Sezgin E, Özkan-Yıldırım S. A cross-sectional investigation of acceptance of health information technology: a nationwide survey of community pharmacists in Turkey. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2016;12(6):949-65. [PubMed]
11. Moore GC, Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf Syst Res. 1991;2(3):192-222. [Full text]
12. Ward R. The application of technology acceptance and diffusion of innovation models in healthcare informatics. Health Policy Technol. 2013;2(4):222-8. [Full text]
13. Lakbala P, Dindarloo K. Physicians’ perception and attitude toward electronic medical record. Springerplus. 2014;3(1):63. [PubMed]
14. Tao D, Xie L, Wang T, Wang T. A meta-analysis of the use of electronic reminders for patient adherence to medication in chronic disease care. J Telemed Telecare. 2015;21(1):3-13. [PubMed]
15. Or CKL, Karsh BT. A systematic review of patient acceptance of consumer health information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16(4):550-60. [PubMed]
16. Montague E, Perchonok J. Health and wellness technology use by historically underserved health consumers: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(3):e78. [PubMed]
17. Jimison H, Gorman P, Woods S, Nygren P, Walker M, Norris S, Hersh W. Barriers and drivers of health information technology use for the elderly, chronically ill, and underserved. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2008;(175):1-1422. [PubMed]
18. Wang SJ, Middleton B, Prosser LA, Bardon CG, Spurr CD, Carchidi PJ, et al. A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. Am J Med. 2003;114(5):397-403. [PubMed]
19. Burton-Jones A, Hubona GS. Individual differences and usage behavior: revisiting a technology acceptance model assumption. ACM Sigmis Database. 2005;36(2):58-77. [Full text]
20. Sandhu K. Theoretical perspectives for e-Services acceptance model. In: Sobh T, editor. Advances in computer and information sciences and engineering. Bridgeport: Springer; 2008. p. 218-23. [Full text]
21. Simon SR, Kaushal R, Cleary PD, Jenter CA, Volk LA, Poon EG, et al. Correlates of electronic health record adoption in office practices: a statewide survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(1):110-7. [PubMed]
22. Panagiotopoulos P, Al-Debei MM, Fitzgerald G, Elliman T. A business model perspective for ICTs in public engagement. Govern Inf Q. 2012;29(2):192-202. [Full text]
23. Ghazisaeidi M, Ahmadi M, Sadoughi F, Safdari R. A roadmap to pre-implementation of electronic health record: the key step to success. Acta Inform Med. 2014;22(2):133-8. [PubMed]
24. LeRouge C, Van Slyke C, Seale D, Wright K. Baby boomers' adoption of consumer health technologies: survey on readiness and barriers. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(9):e200. [PubMed]
25. Holden RJ, Karsh BT. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform. 2010;43(1):159-72. [Full text]
26. Bagozzi RP. The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. J Assoc Information Syst. 2007;8(4):244-54. [Full text]
27. Al-Hujran O, Al-Debei MM, Chatfield A, Migdadi M. The imperative of influencing citizen attitude toward e-government adoption and use. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;53:189-203. [Full text]
28. Beldad A, de Jong M, Steehouder M. I trust not therefore it must be risky: Determinants of the perceived risks of disclosing personal data for e-government transactions. Comput Hum Behav. 2011;27(6):2233-42. [Full text]
29. Hanafizadeh P, Yarmohammadi M. An integrated conceptualization of content in an information society. Inf Dev. 2016;32(4):880-9. [Full text]
30. Naderi E, Seif Naraghi M. Research methods‭ and its evaluation in human sciences. 6th Edition. Tehran: Arasbaran; 2010. p. 336. [Persian]‬‬ [Full text]
31. Zargar SM, Alizadeh Otaghvar H, Danaei A, Babaei M. Factors affecting of telemedicine technology acceptance among technology specialists in Iranian hospitals. Razi J Med Sci. 2017;24(161):88-98. [Persian] [Full text]
32. Razzaghi R, Nasiripur A. Factors affecting the adoption of electronic health record (HER) based on TTF and UTAUT Models. In: Proceedings of the First Regional Information Technology Conference; 2013 Dec 5; Tabarestan Institute of Higher Education, Chalus, Mazandaran, Iran. Civilica; 2013. [Persian] [Full text]
33. Barooti N. Conceptual model of information technology acceptance for banking system staff (case study: Saderat bank staff in Tehran) [Dissertation]. Tehran: Alzahra University; 2006. [Persian] [Full text]
34. Dwivedi YK, Shareef MA, Simintiras AC, Lal B, Weerakkody V. A generalised adoption model for services: a cross-country comparison of mobile health (m-health). Govern Inf Q. 2016;33(1):174-87. [Full text]
35. Wongkaew T, Thammakoranonta N. Factors effecting consumers’ attitudes toward using of e-Healthcare. International DSI/Asia and Pacific DSI. 2007. [Full text]
36. Khoja SRA. Developing and validating'e-health readiness assessment tools' for public and private healthcare institutions in Pakistan [Dissertation]. Pakistan: UMI; 2007. [Full text]
37. Silber D. The Case for e-Health. In: Proceedings of European Commission’s First High-Level Conference on e-Health; 2003 May 22-23; European Institute for Public Administration (EIPA), Brussels, Belgium. [Full text]
38. Azizi AA, Hasibian MR, Tara SM. systematic review of the factors influencing the implementation and acceptance of electronic health records. J Med Counc Iran. 2014;31(4):289-97. [Persian] [Full text]
39. Abdekhoda M, Ahmadi M, Gohari M, Noruzi A. The effects of organizational contextual factors on physicians' attitude toward adoption of Electronic Medical Records. J Biomed Inform. 2015 Feb;53:174-9. [PubMed]
40. Pai FY, Huang KI. Applying the technology acceptance model to the introduction of healthcare information systems. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2011;78(4):650-60. [Full text]
41. DeLuca JM, Enmark R. E-health: the changing model of healthcare. Front Health Serv Manage. 2000;17(1):3-15. [PubMed]
42. Lee Y, Kozar KA, Larsen KRT. The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Commun Assoc Inf Syst. 2003;12(1):752-80. [Full text]
43. Cheng TC, Li AX. Maltreatment and families' receipt of services: associations with reunification, kinship care, and adoption. Fam Soc J Contemp Soc Serv. 2012;93(3):189-95. [Full text]
44. Kamal MM, Themistocleous M. A conceptual model for EAI adoption in an e-government environment. In: Proceedings of European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (EMCIS); 2006 July 6-7; Costa Blanca, Alicante, Spain. [Full text]
45. Natagh F, Rezaei Rad M. Electronic health role to provide health care services. Educ Sci J Sch Health. 2011;11(42):23-33. [Persian] [Full text]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


© 2020 All Rights Reserved | J Educ Community Health

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb