Volume 1, Issue 2 (Summer 2014)
J Educ Community Health 2014, 1(2): 56-66 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Moeini B, Rezapur-Shahkolai F, Faradmal J, Soheylizad M. Effect of an Educational Program Based on the Health Belief Model to Reduce Cell Phone Usage During Driving in Taxi drivers. J Educ Community Health. 2014; 1 (2) :56-66
URL: http://jech.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-33-en.html
URL: http://jech.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-33-en.html
1- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
2- Modeling of Noncommunicable Disease Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
3- Department of Public Health, School of Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran. , m.soheylizad@yahoo.com
2- Modeling of Noncommunicable Disease Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
3- Department of Public Health, School of Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran. , m.soheylizad@yahoo.com
Abstract: (11249 Views)
Introduction: Cell phone usage during driving has become a threat to traffic safety. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of an educational program based on the health belief model to reduce cell phone usage during driving in taxi drivers of Tuyserkan.
Materials and Methods: In this quasi-experimental study, 110 taxi drivers younger than 35 years were randomly divided into two experimental and control groups in Tuyserkan, Iran. Data was collected using a questionnaire including the health belief model constructs, knowledge, behaviors of using cell phone and demographic variables. The questionnaires were self-reported. Intervention was three sessions applied in the experimental group. Both groups were followed for two months after the intervention. Finally, data analysis was performed using SPSS- 19 by Chi-square, Independent T-test, Paired T-test and McNemar.
Results: The mean scores for the constructs of health belief model (perceived susceptibility, severity, barriers, perceived benefits, self-efficacy and cues to action), knowledge and desired behaviors about the use of cell phone during driving showed no significant differences between the two groups before the intervention. After the educational intervention, significant differences were observed in experimental group compared to control group. After educational intervention, cell phone usage reduced by 35.14% in the experimental group.
Conclusion: An educational intervention based on the health belief model could reduce cell phone usage during driving in taxi drivers.
Type of Study: Research Article |
Subject:
Injury Prevention
Received: 2014/08/6 | Accepted: 2014/10/12
Received: 2014/08/6 | Accepted: 2014/10/12
English Expanded Abstract [HTML 25 KB] (217 Download)
References
1. World Health Organization. World report on road injury prevention. WHO Web Site; 2005 [updated 18 August, 2014; cited 28 November, 2014]; Available from: http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/publications/road_traffic/world_report/en/
2. Zhao N, Reimer B, Mehler B, D'Ambrosio LA, Coughlin JF. Self-reported and observed risky driving behaviors among frequent and infrequent cell phone users. Accid Anal Prev.2013; 61:71-7.
3. Schlehofer MM, Thompson SC, Ting S, Ostermann S, Nierman A, Skenderian J. Psychological predictors of college students’ cell phone use while driving. Accid Anal Prev.2010; 42(4):1107-12.
4. Lissy KS, Cohen IT, Park MY, Graham JD. Cellular phone use while driving: Risks and Benefits. Boston; Harvard center for risk analysis, Harvard school of public health; 2000.
5. Lee JD, McGehee DV, Brown TL, Reyes ML. Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator. Hum Factors.2002; 44(2):314-34.
6. Ashrafi-Asgarabad A, Naghibzadeh-Tahami A, Khanjani N. Exposure to hand-held mobile phone use while driving among Iranian passenger car drivers: an observational study. J Inj Violence Res.2012; 4(2): 96-7.
7. National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration. Driver electronic device use in 2010. NHTSA Web Site; 2011. [updated 18 January, 2014; cited 29 November, 2014]; Available from: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs /811517.pdf
8. Charlton SG. Driving while conversing: cell phones that distract and passengers who react. Accid Anal Prev.2008; 41(1):160-73.
9. Caird JK, Willness CR, Steel P, Scialfa C. A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance. Accid Anal Prev.2008; 40(4):1282-93.
10. Engström J, Aust ML, Viström M. Effects of working memory load and repeated scenario exposure on emergency braking performance. Hum Factors.2010; 52(5):551-9.
11. Reimer B, Mehler B, Wang Y, Coughlin JF. A field study on the impact of variations in short-term memory demands on drivers’ visual attention and driving performance across three age groups. Hum Factors.2012; 54(3):454-68.
12. Rakauskas ME, Gugerty LJ, Ward NJ. Effects of naturalistic cell phone conversations on driving performance. J Safety Res.2004; 35(4):453-64.
13. Cooper JM, Vladisavljevic I, Medeiros-Ward N, Martin PT, Strayer DL. An investigation of driver distraction near the tipping point of traffic flow stability. Hum Factors.2009; 51(2): 261-8.
14. Ranney TA, Harbluk JL, Noy YI. Effects of voice technology on test track driving performance: implications for driver distraction. Hum Factors.2005; 47(2):439-54.
15. Collet C, Guillot A, Petit C. Phoning while driving I: A review of epidemiological, psychological, behavioural and physiological studies. Ergonomics.2010; 53(5):589-601.
16. Wilson FA, Stimpson JP. Trends in fatalitiesfrom distracted driving in the United States, 1999 to 2008. Am J Public Health.2010; 100(11):2213-9.
17. McEvoy SP, Stevenson MR, McCartt AT, Woodward M, Haworth C, Palamara P, et al. Role of mobile phones in motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance: A case-crossover study. BMJ.2005; 331(7514):428.
18. Reed N, Robbins R. The Effect of Text Messaging on Driver Behavior: A Simulator Study. UK: Transport Research Laboratory, Berkshire; 2008. Available from: http://www.racfoundation.org/assets/rac_foundation/content/downloadables/texting%20whilst%20driving%20-%20trl%20-%20180908%20-%20report.pdf
19. Olson RL, Hanowski RJ, Hickman JS, Bocanegra J. Driver Distraction in Commercial Vehicle Operations [Final Report]. Washington DC: Federal Motor Carriers Safety Administration; 2009.
20. Shooreshi A. [Cell phone use while driving and its role in reducing accidents and increasing safety]. Traffic Management Studies.2007; 9(3):95-108. (Persian)
21. Landry MJ. MDMA: A review of epidemiologic data. J Pscychoactive Drugs.2002; 34(2):163-9.
22. Edelman CL, Mandel CL. Health promotion, throughout the lifespan.5thed. New York: Mosby; 2002, P:246-9.
23. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Health behavior and health education: theory, research and practice.4thed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass publisher; 2008, PP:45-92.
24. Rahimikian F, Mirmohamadaliei M, Mehran A, Aboozari-Ghforoodi K, Salmaani Barough N. [Effect of Education Designed based on Health Belief Model on Choosing Delivery Mode]. Journal of Hayat.2009; 14(3&4):25-32. (Persian)
25. Karimy M, Niknami SH, Amin Shokravi F, Shamsi M, Hatami A. [The relationship of breast self-examination with self-esteem and perceived benefits/barriers of self-efficacy in health volunteers of Zarandieh city]. Iranian Journal of Breast Diseases.2009; 2(2):41-8. (Persian)
26. Rezaeian M, Sharifirad G, Mostafavi F, Moodi M, Abbasi MH. The effects of breast cancer educational intervention on knowledge and health beliefs of women 40 years and older, Isfahan, Iran. J Educ Health Promot.2014; 3:43.
27. Taghdisi MH, Nejadsadeghi E. [The effect of health education based on health belief model on behavioral promotion of urinary infection prevention in pregnant women]. Journal Research & Health.2012; 2(1):126-36. (Persian)
28. Allen JD, Stoddard AM, Mays J, Sorensen G. Promoting breast and cervical cancer screening at the workplace: Results from the Woman to Woman Study. Am J Public Health.2001; 91(4):584-90.
29. Ceber E, Turk M, Ciceklioglu M. The effects of an educational program on knowledge of breast cancer, early detection practices and health beliefs of nurses and midwives. J Clin Nurs.2010; 19(15-16):2363–71.
30. Hatamzadeh N, Nazari M, Ghahramani L. [Impact of educational intervention on seat belt use among drivers based on health belief model]. Journal of Toloo-e-Behdasht.2013; 3(36): 45-55. (Persian)
31. Hanewinkel R, Asshauer M. Fifteen-month follow-up results of a school-based life-skills approach to smoking prevention. Health Educ Res.2004; 19(2):125-37.
32. Karimi M, Ghofranipor F, Heidarnia AR. [The effect of health education based on health belief model on preventive actions of AIDS on addict in Zarandieh]. Journal of Guilan University of Medical Sciences.2009; 18(70):64-73. (Persian)
33. Zamani-Alavijeh F, Faghihzadeh S, Sadeghi F. [Application of the Health Belief Model for unhealthy eating prevention among primary school children in Arak/Iran (2004-2005)]. Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences.2007; 11(4):352-67. (Persian)
34. Carmel S. The health belief model in the research of AIDS-related preventive behavior. Public Health Rev.1991; 18(1):73-85.
35. Tussing L, Chapman-Novakofski K. Osteoporosis prevention education: behavior theories and calcium intake. J Am Diet Assoc.2005; 105(1):92-7.
36. Zhang YP, Li XM, Wang DL, Guo XY, Guo X. Evaluation of educational program on osteoporosis awareness and prevention among nurse students in China. Nurs Health Sci.2012; 14(1):74-80.
37. Boroumandfar K, Shabani F, Ghaffari M. An investigation on the effect of Health Belief Model-based education on refusal skills in high risk situations among female students. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res.2012; 17(3):229-33.
Send email to the article author
