Volume 3, Issue 4 (Winter 2017)                   J Educ Community Health 2017, 3(4): 52-58 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Tabatabaeirad E S, Akbari Balootbangan A. Prediction of Internet Addiction and Social Anxiety Based on Parenting Styles in Adolescents of Sabzevar, Iran. J Educ Community Health. 2017; 3 (4) :52-58
URL: http://jech.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-257-en.html
1- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran , e.taba2014@gmail.com
2- Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
Abstract:   (7113 Views)

Background and Objectives: Parenting styles are one of the most important factors in shaping adolescents’ behaviors and personality. Therefore, we aimed to predict internet addiction and social anxiety based on parenting styles.
Materials and Methods: This descriptive and correlational study was performed in 400 high school students of Sabzevar, Iran, in 2015. The participants were selected using multi-stage cluster sampling method. The data were collected using Yang’s Internet Addiction Test (IAT), Social Anxiety Scale (SAS-A), and Baumrind’s Parenting Styles Questionnaire. To analyze the data, Pearson correlation coefficient and multiple regression were run in SPSS, version 22.
Results: We found a significant positive correlation between the authoritarian and permissive parenting styles and Internet addiction (r=0.102, r=0.210, respectively) and social anxiety (r=0.576, r=0.517, respectively). Moreover, a significant negative correlation was observed between the authoritative parenting style and Internet addiction and social anxiety (r= -0.291 and r= -0.263, respectively). In addition, multiple regression analysis reflected that the parenting styles could predict Internet addiction and social anxiety, and they explained respectively 39% and 35% of the variance.
Conclusions: According to the results, adopting proper educational methods and implementing practical plans can predict Internet addiction and improve positive relationships among individuals.

Full-Text [PDF 470 kb]   (3574 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research Article | Subject: Mental Health
Received: 2017/01/19 | Accepted: 2017/03/14

1. Ghassemzadeh L, Shahraray M, Moradi A. Prevalence of internet addiction in girls and a comparison of addicted and non-addicted girls in lonelinness’, self-esteem and social skills. Contemporary Psychol. 2007;2(1):32-40.
2. Weinstein A, Feder LC, Rosenberg KP, Dannon P. Internet addiction disorder: overview and controversies. Behav Addict. 2014;5:99-117. [DOI]
3. Chang FC, Chiu CH, Lee CM, Chen PH, Miao NF. Predictors of the initiation and persistence of Internet addiction among adolescents in Taiwan. Addict Behav. 2014;39(10):1434-40. [DOI] [PubMed]
4. Park MH, Park EJ, Choi J, Chai S, Lee JH, Lee C, et al. Preliminary study of internet addiction and cognitive function in adolescents based on IQ tests. Psychiatry Res. 2011;90(2-3): 275-81. [DOI] [PubMed]
5. Orsal O, Orsal O, Unsal A, Ozalp SS. Evaluation of internet addiction and depression among university students. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 2013;82(3):445-54. [DOI]
6. Brenner V. Psychology of computer use: XLVII. Parameters of internet use, abuse and addiction: the first 90 days of the internet usage survey. Psychol Rep.1997;80(3 Pt 1):879-82. [DOI] [PubMed]
7. Atashpour H, Jalali D, Asadiyan S. Comparison of internet addiction based on thinking styles of its users. Know Res Appl Psychol. 2005;23(7):55-72. [Persian]
8. Khayer M, Ostovar S. The relationship between social anxiety and cognitive biases in adolescents. Iran J Psych Clin Psychol. 2005;13(3):256-63. [Persian]
9. Basaknejad S, Moeni N, Honarmand M. The relationship processing the events and avoid Cognitive with social anxiety in students. J Behav Sci. 2005;4(4):336-9. [Persian]
10. Kent G, Keohan S. Social anxiety and disfigurement: the moderating effects of fear of negative evaluation and past experience. Br J Clin Psychol. 2001;40(1):23-34. [PubMed]
11. Foa EB, Franklin ME, Pery KJ, Herbert JD. Cognitive biases in generalized social phobia. J Abnorm Psychol. 1996;105(3):433-9. [PubMed]
12. Dalbudak E, Evren C. The relationship of Internet addiction severity with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder symptoms in Turkish University students; impact of personality traits, depression and anxiety. Compr Psychiatry. 2014;55(3):497-503. [DOI] [PubMed]
13. Servidio R. Exploring the effects of demographic factors, Internet usage and personality traits on Internet addiction in a sample of Italian university students. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;35:58-92. [DOI]
14. Baumrind D. Effective parenting during the early adolescent transition. Fam Transit. 1991;2(1):121-40.
15. Green RW. The explosive child: a new approach for understanding and parenting easily frustrated," chronically inflexible" children. New York: HarperCollins Publishers;1998.
16. Tucker CM, Zayco RA, Herman KC, Reinke WM, Trujillo M, Carraway K, et al. Teacher and child variables as predictors of academic engagement among low-income African American children. Psychol Sch. 2002;39(4):477-88. [DOI]
17. Dornbusch SM, Ritter PL, Leiderman RH, Roberts DF, Farleigh MJ. The relation of parenting style to adolescent school performance. Child Dev. 1987;58(5):1244-57. [DOI]
18. Danesh E, Takrimi Z, Nafisi GH. The role of childrearing styles of parent on the ratio of their children depression. J Appl Psychol. 2007;1(2):125-40. [Persian]
19. Aminabadi Z, Khodapanahi MK, Dehghani M. Examining the mediating role of cognitive emotion regulation in the relationship between perceived parenting style dimensions and academic achievement. J Behav Sci. 2011;5(2):5-6. [Persian]
20. Valcke M, Bonte S, Wever BD, Rots I. Internet parenting styles and the impact on Internet use of primary school children. Comput Educ. 2010;55(2):454-64. [DOI]
21. Esen BK, Aktas E, Tuncer I. An analysis of university students’ internet use in relation to loneliness and social self-efficacy. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 2013;84:1504-8. [DOI]
22. Aydm B, San SV. Internet addiction among adolescents: the role of self-esteem. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 2011;15:3500-5. [DOI]
23. Gunuc S, Dogan A. The relationships between Turkish adolescents’ Internet addiction, their perceived social support and family activities. Comput Hum Behav. 2013;29(6):2197-7. [DOI]
24. Lee BW, Stapinski LA. Seeking safety on the internet: relationship between social anxiety and problematic internet use. J Anxiety Disord. 2012;26(1):197-205. [DOI] [PubMed]
25. Dalbudak E, Evren C, Aldemir S, Evren B. The severity of Internet addiction risk and its relationship with the severity of borderline personality features, childhood traumas, dissociative experiences, depression and anxiety symptoms among Turkish University Students. Psychiatry Res. 2014;219(3):577-82. [DOI] [PubMed]
26. Asfandiyari GH. Compare parenting styles in two groups of mothers of children with behavior disorders and the impact of education in reducing behavioral disturbances. [Master's Thesis]. Tehran: Medical Research Institute; 1995.
27. Ostovar S, Razavieh A. Psychometric characteristics AS-A social anxiety for adolescents for use in Iran. Proceeding of the 5th National Symposium on Child and adolescent mental health. 2003; October 8; Zanjan, Iran. P. 16-17. [Persian]
28. Bahri N, SadeghMoghadam L, Khodadost L, Mohammadzade J, Banafsheh E. Internet addiction status and its relation with students’ general health at Gonabad Medical University. Modern Care J. 2011;8(3):166-73. [Persian]
29. Alizadeh H, Andries C. Interaction of parenting styles and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in interaction parents. Child Fam Ther. 2005;24(3):37-52. [DOI]
30. Lu WH, Lee KH, Ko CH, Hsiao RC, Hu HF, Yen CF. Relationship between borderline personality symptoms and Internet addiction: the mediating effects of mental health problems. J Behav Addict. 2017;29:1-8. [DOI] [PubMed]
31. Wolfradt U, Hempel S, Miles JN. Perceived parenting styles, depersonalization, anxiety and coping behavior inadolescents. Personal Individ Diff. 2003;34(3):521-32.
32. Valcke M, Bonte S, De Wever B, Rots I. Internet parenting styles and the impact on Internet use of primary school children. Comput Educ. 2010;55(2):454-64.‌ [DOI]
33. Chou HL, Chou C, Chen CH. The moderating effects of parenting styles on the relation between the internet attitudes and internet behaviors of high-school students in Taiwan. Comput Educ. 2016;94:204-14.‌ [DOI]
34. Lamborn SD, Mounts NS, Steinberg L, Dornbuch SM. Patterns of competence and adjustment among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, in fulgent and neglectful families. Child Dev. 1991;62(5):1051-59. [DOI]
35. Lieb R, Wittchen HU, Höfler M, Fuetsch M, Stein MB, Merikangas KR. Parental psychopathology, parenting styles, and the risk of social phobia in offspring: a prospective-longitudinal community study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57(9):859-66. [PubMed]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

© 2021 CC BY-NC 4.0 | J Educ Community Health

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb