Logo-jech
Submitted: 29 Aug 2023
Revised: 29 Oct 2023
Accepted: 14 Nov 2023
First published online: 29 Dec 2023
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - FireFox Plugin)

Abstract View: 1066
PDF Download: 556
Full Text View: 7
J Educ Community Health. 10(4):217-224. doi: 10.34172/jech.2593

Original Article

Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors and Menopausal Symptoms in Postmenopausal Women: A Cross-sectional Study

Soudabeh Zarvekanloo 1, Zahra Rahimi 1, Zahra Arab Borzu 2, Shayesteh Shirzadi 3, * ORCID logo

Author information:
1Students Research Committee, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, Iran
2Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Health, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Iran
3Healthy Ageing Research Centre, Department of Public Health, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, Iran

*Corresponding author: Shayesteh Shirzadi, Email: shayestehshirzadi@gmail.com

Abstract

Background: One of the factors influencing the modification of menopausal symptoms is health-promoting behaviors (HPBs). Nevertheless, women do not have sufficient knowledge about HPBs and do not earn the required information and training in this field. The current study was thus performed to study the relationship between HPBs and menopausal symptoms (MSs) among Iranian postmenopausal women (PMW).

Methods: Using stratified random sampling, this current cross-sectional study was carried out on 300 PMW covered by Neyshabur healthcare centers in 2022. Data gathering was conducted using three questionnaires: demographic characteristics, health-promoting lifestyle profile-II (HPLP- II), and menopause rating scale (MRS). Pearson correlation test and stepwise regression analysis were used for analyzing data by SPSS v. 22, and the significance level was less than 0.05.

Results: The mean age and menopausal age of participants were 56.4 (4.1) and 49.4 (3.3), respectively. There was a significant negative statistical relationship between the total score of HPBs and its subscales and MSs (P<.05). Physical activity, spiritual growth, and having chronic diseases were found to be independent predictors of MSs.

Conclusion: Based on the findings, there was an adverse correlation between HPBs and MSs in the women who participated in the study. Executing educational programs focusing on maintaining and promoting a healthy lifestyle can reduce MSs; as a result, increasing overall women’s quality of life.

Keywords: Health-promoting behaviors, Healthy lifestyle, Menopausal symptoms, Post menopause, Women

Copyright and License Information

© 2023 The Author(s); Published by Hamadan University of Medical Sciences.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Please cite this article as follows: Zarvekanloo S, Rahimi Z, Arab Borzu Z, Shirzadi S. Healthy lifestyle behaviors and menopausal symptoms in postmenopausal women: a cross-sectional study. J Educ Community Health. 2023; 10(4):217-224. doi:10.34172/jech.2593


Introduction

Menopause is an inherent physiological phenomenon that takes place in women as they grow older, denoting the cessation of menstruation and the ability to reproduce. This phase is typified by a change in the production of ovarian hormones, comprising a decline in es trogen levels and a rise in follicle-stimulating hormone levels (1). Menopause normally occurs around 50 years, with the majority of women experiencing menopause between the ages of 45 and 55 (2). Postmenopausal women (PMW) experience vasomotor, physical, physiological, and sexual symptoms (3). Hot flashes, sleep disturbance, psychological problems, sexual disorders, overweight, and cognitive decline are some symptoms that menopausal women suffer from (4). In addition, vaginal dryness, burning sensation, dyspareunia, and urinary incontinence are other symptoms that women experience due to estrogen deficiency (5). As menopausal status advances, sexual function tends to decrease, with commonly reported symptoms, including low sexual desire, inadequate lubrication, and dyspareunia (6). These symptoms can adversely affect women’s daily life and quality of life (7-9). Many women are looking for different and numerous methods to alleviate menopause symptoms (5,10); however, a large number of women do not manage their problematic symptoms due to the lack of awareness or embarrassment related to sexual issues (5).

Menopause considerably enhances the risk of metabolic disorders and cardiovascular diseases such as overweight and obesity, liver-related disease, fatty liver disease, type 2 diabetes, and other metabolic disorders. One of the influential agents affecting the modification of menopause symptoms and health status is health-promoting behaviors (HPBs). Changing and modifying lifestyles such as a healthy diet and appropriate physical activity are essential for the control and prevention of metabolic diseases during menopause (11).

However, women do not have sufficient knowledge about HPBs and do not receive the required information and training in this field (12). In addition, a majority of women do not receive any health education on menopause and are not familiar with the skills of the management of menopause symptoms (13,14).

HPBs refer to actions and beliefs that individuals adopt to maintain and improve their health. These behaviors extend beyond mere disease prevention and, instead, strive towards achieving holistic well-being, self-realization, and the attainment of personal satisfaction. According to Pender’s theory, HPBs include six dimensions of nutrition, stress management (SM), interpersonal relationships (IR), health responsibility (HR), physical activity (PA), and spiritual growth (SG) (15).

HPBs such as a healthy diet, appropriate physical activity, and proper weight control can help alleviate some MSs (1,14,16). In a survey by Sehhatie et al on Iranian PMW, the HPBs in PMW were moderate (12). The lifestyle modification program can lead to a reduction in menopausal symptoms) MSs( (17). In another study, women who were active in terms of physical activity had a higher quality of life compared to other women (18). Awareness and information related to menopause event and its symptoms, as well as their modification methods, can be effective in reducing women’s problems during this period (19).

Middle-aged women are a significant part of the population, and their contribution to the dynamics of economic and social aspects of society is crucial (20). As PMW are among the vulnerable groups in society, it is imperative to find a solution to enhance their health. Therefore, it is crucial to identify and implement effective measures that can optimize their overall well-being (21). Given the significance of HPBs in PMWs, this study was carried out to investigate the correlation between HPBs and MSs in Iranian PMW.


Materials and Methods

Study Design and Participants

This cross-sectional investigation was conducted on 300 Iranian PMW sampled from Neyshabur County, Razavi Khorasan Province, Iran, in 2022.

Eligibility criteria included aged between 45-60 years old, having experience of menopause after 45 years of age, having no abnormal menopause (hysterectomy surgery and chemotherapy), having no hormone therapy in the last 6 months, and minimum of 12 months have passed since their last menstrual cycle. Exclusion criteria included having a physical or mental disability, experiencing unfortunate events and incidents in the last 6 months, and not using tobacco and alcoholic beverages.

The sampling frame consisted of the general population residing in urban areas who were recipients of healthcare services provided by regional healthcare centers. In terms of determining the sample size, a stratified sampling approach was employed to select the participating women. To this end, the researcher initially ascertained the overall count of women availing of healthcare services at these centers. Consequently, the healthcare centers with a higher number of female beneficiaries were allocated a larger sample size, commensurate with their respective proportions.

To determine the sample size, the primary information was obtained from a previous study (13). We determined sample size using the formula, where α = 0.05, B = 10%, and R = - 0.404. Considering about 20% attrition, the sample size was enhanced to 300.

n=Z1α2+Z1β2ω2ω=12log1+r1r

All participating women completed the informed consent form before entering the study after providing them with detailed information.

The collection of data was done using a survey instrument. Trained interviewers were responsible for gathering the data from the respondents, offering assistance to illiterate women in filling out the questionnaire. Moreover, participants were given the freedom to either withdraw or continue their participation in the study during the data collection phase.

Instruments

The questionnaire employed in this investigation comprised three distinct sections:

Socio-Demographic Variables

This includes the spouse’s educational status, family income status, age, menopausal age, occupation, educational status, number of children, family structure, history of chronic disease, and marital status.

Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile-II

Health-promoting lifestyle profile- II(HPLP- II) was developed by Walker et al in 1987 to measure HPBs (15). We used the validated Persian version of HPLP-II (22). In this study, Cronbach’s Alpha was used to evaluate internal consistency (0.78). This scale included 52 questions that were graded on a four-point Likert scale (1 = never, 2 = frequently, 3 = almost, and 4 = always). The HPLP-II includes six subscales: nutrition (nine items), IR (nine items), HR (nine items), PA (nine items), SG (nine items), and SM (eight items). The lowest score and the highest score obtained for this scale were 52 and 208, respectively, and the highest score in each subscale indicates healthier behaviors.

Menopause Rating Scale

Menopause rating scale (MRS) was designed by Heinemann et al in 2003 to measure the MSs (23). The validated Persian version of MRS was used in this study (24), and Cronbach’s Alpha was employed to evaluate internal consistency (0.88). This scale included 11 questions that were graded on a five-point Likert scale (1 = not at all, 2 = minor, 3 = mediate, 4 = severe, and 4 = very severe). The MRS includes three subscales: somatic symptoms (four items), psychological symptoms (four items), and urogenital symptoms (three items). The lowest score and the highest score obtained for this scale were 11 and 55, respectively, and the highest score in each subscale indicates more severe MSs.

Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed using SPSS 22 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) and were reported by mean (SD) and frequency (percent). To analyze the relationship between HPBs and MSs, the Pearson correlation test was used. Then, to adjust confounding variables and assess the impact of independent variables (HPBs) on dependent variables (MSs), stepwise regression analysis (forward strategy) was used. A significance level of less than 0.05 was considered.


Results

A total of 300 menopausal women were surveyed. The average age of menopause (SD) was 49.4 (3.3), and the mean age (SD) of them was 56.4 (4.1). Most of the participants were married (75%) and housewives (88%), had 3 or more children (80%), and suffered from at least one chronic disease (65.7%). In addition, the economic status of 67.3% of individuals was moderate. The demographic characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1.


Table 1. Demographic and Underlying Characteristics of the Postmenopausal Women (N = 300)
Variables No. (%)
Age
45-50 39 (13)
51-55 73 (24.3)
56 +  188 (62.7)
Employment status
Housewife 264 (88)
Employed 36 (12)
Educational status
Illiterate 56 (18.7)
Elementary school 15 (50.2)
Guidance school 44 (14.7)
Diploma and university 49 (16.4)
Marital status
Divorced/widow/Single 75 (25)
Married 225 (75)
No. of children
0 9 (3)
1 14 (4.7)
2 37 (12.3)
3 +  240 (80)
Menopause age
45-50 217 (72.3)
51-55 71 (23.7)
56 +  12 (4)
Family structure
Living alone 45 (15)
Living with husband 103 (34.3)
Living with husband and children 122 (40.7)
Living with children 30 (10)
Economic status
Weak 53 (17.7)
Moderate 202 (67.3)
Good 45 (15)
Spouse’s educational status
Illiterate 51 (17)
Elementary school 113 (37.7)
Guidance school 43 (14.3)
Diploma and university 93 (31)
Having chronic diseases
Yes 203 (65.7)
No 97 (32.3)

There was a negative significant correlation between HPB total score and MS total scores and its two subscales of urogenital symptoms and psychological symptoms (P < .05). On the other hand, no correlation was found between total HPB scores and somatic symptoms subscale of MRS (P > 0.05). Regarding correlation between HPB dimensions and MS subscales, a significant negative correlation was detected between SG and SM dimensions and MS total scores and its subscale scores (P < 0.05). PA was negatively correlated with MS total scores and its two subscales of psychological symptoms and urogenital symptoms (P < 0.05) but not correlated with somatic symptom subscale. Likewise, HR and IR were negatively correlated with urogenital symptom and psychological symptom subscales, respectively (P < 0.05). Furthermore, nutrition was negatively correlated with somatic symptoms and psychological symptoms, as well as MS total scores (P < 0.05) but not correlated with urogenital symptom (Table 2).


Table 2. Correlation Between HPBs and Its Domains and MSs Among PMW (N = 300)
HPBs MSs
Somatic Symptoms Psychological Symptoms Urogenital Symptoms Total MS Scores
Health responsibility R = 0.08
P = 0.165
R = -0.01
P = 0.065
R = -0.119
P = 0.039*
R = -0.057
P = 0.329
Physical activity R = -0.1
P = 0.059
R = -0.262
P = 0.001*
R = -0.189
P = 0.001*
R = -0.241
P = 0.001*
Nutrition R = -0.144
P = 0.01*
R = -0.167
P = 0.004*
R = -0.058
P = 0.319
R = -0.165
P = 0.004*
Spiritual growth R = -0. 136
P = 0.018*
R = -0.307
P = 0.001*
R = -0.136
P = 0.01*
R = -0.256
P = 0.001*
Interpersonal relations R = -0.01
P = 0.778
R = -0.142
P = 0.001*
R = -0.086
P = 0.138
R = -0.1
P = 0.168
Stress management R = -0.135
P = 0.02*
R = -0.227
P = 0.001*
R = -0.125
P = 0.031*
R = -0.213
P = 0.001*
Total HPB scores R = -0.096
P = 0.097
R = -0.278
P = 0.001*
R = -0.169
P = 0.003*
R = -0.235
P = 0.001*

Note. HPB: Health-promoting behavior; MS: Menopausal symptom; PMW: Postmenopausal women.

The results of multivariate regression analyses indicated that after adjusting for confounding variables, PA, SG, and chronic diseases had a significant correlation with MSs (P < 0.05). On this basis, by increasing one unit in the average score of PA, the mean score for MSs decreased by 0.149. In addition, a one-unit increase in the average score of SG resulted in a 0.19 decrease in the MS adoption among the women. Therefore, the average score of MSs for those without chronic disease was 0.186 lower than that for those with chronic disease (Table 3).


Table 3. Multivariate Results for Factors Associated with Total Menopause Rating Scale Score
Variable Step1 Step 2
B t P Value B t P Value
Step1
Health responsibility 0.057 0.875 0.382 0.023 0.337 0.726
Physical activity -0.155 -0.944 0.017* -0.149 -2.16 0.031*
Nutrition -0.072 -2.097 0. 37 -0.024 -0.338 0.736
Spiritual growth -0.178 -1.09 0.021* -0.19 -2.344 0.02*
Interpersonal relations 0.091 1.21 0.221 0.084 1.1 0.27
Stress management -0.115 -1.5 0.319 -0.063 -0.809 0.419
Step2
Age 0.037 0.523 0.602
Employment status
Employed -0.103 -0.103 0.193
Housewife
Educational status
Illiterate -0.237 -0.623 0.534
Elementary school -0.287 -0.659 0.51
Guidance school -0.061 -0.723 0.47
Diploma and university
Marital status
Divorced/widow/Single 0.204 1.1 0.269
No. of children 0.028 0.403 0.687
Menopause age -0.02 -0.324 0.74
Family structure
Living alone 0.127 0.84 0.40
Living with husband 0.047 0.681 0.49
Living with children 0.153 1.1 0.27
Living with husband and children
Economic status
Weak 0.031 0.346 0.73
Moderate 0.046 0.544 0.58
Good
Spouse’s educational status
Illiterate 0.056 0.65 0.51
Elementary school 0.062 0.733 0.46
Guidance school 0.065 0.95 0.34
Diploma and university
Having chronic diseases
Yes -0.186 -3.1 0.002*
No
R2 9.8% 16.8%

Discussion

The current study was performed to investigate the relationship between HPBs and MSs in 300 PMW. Findings revealed a significant negative correlation between the total HPB score with psychological and urogenital symptoms and the total MS score. To further confirm the results of the present study, educational interventions showed that one of the strategies to moderate MSs is adopting a healthy lifestyle (16,17,25).

The present study also indicated a negative significant relationship between PA and psychological symptoms, urogenital symptoms, and the total MS score. Furthermore, PA was an independent predictor of MSs. In a study, consistent with our results, a statistically significant correlation was found between PA and MSs (10). In another study, women who had moderate PA exhibited significantly fewer psychosocial and physical symptoms than women who had low PA, but no relationship was observed between PA and vasomotor and sexual symptoms (26). Moreover, according to a survey performed by Polat and Aylaz (27) containing a sample size of 156 women, a group of women underwent an exercise program with 30 minutes of exercise daily for 12 weeks. The findings showed a significant reduction in MSs among women who received the program compared with the women in the control group. Similarly, the survey conducted by Soori et al (28) revealed that women who engage in regular or irregular exercise experience less severe symptoms than those who do not exercise at all. Therefore, it is required to educate women about the benefits of exercise and PA for improving MSs. Adequate facilities and resources should also be provided for women to engage in PA.

According to the study’s findings, a significant negative relationship was found between the mean score of nutrition and somatic and psychological symptoms, as well as the total MS score. A survey conducted by Ross (29) found that dietary modifications and the use of supplements can lead to swift improvement and elimination of MSs. In a study carried out by Barnard et al (30), the aim was to evaluate the influence of a blend of a diet rich in plant-based low-fat foods and soybeans on the modulation of menopausal hot flashes. The results of the intervention demonstrated a significant decrease in the occurrence and intensity of hot flashes and a reduction in vasomotor, psychosocial, physical, and sexual symptoms among the participants in the intervention group compared to the control group. Furthermore, a majority of the individuals in the intervention group experienced relief from moderate to severe hot flashes. Research has suggested that nutritional interventions hold promise in effectively managing mood/anxiety (31) and vasomotor symptoms (32) in women during the menopausal transition and postmenopausal period. Therefore, based on the findings of the current investigation and preceding research, augmenting women’s consciousness about nutrition and nutritional interventions can serve to alleviate and improve MSs.

Based on the findings, there was a significant negative relationship between SG and somatic, psychological, and urogenital symptoms, as well as the total MS score. Moreover, SG was an independent predictor of MSs. Additionally, Arab and colleagues’ study (33) indicated that gratitude meditation in the experimental group leads to a significant reduction in vasomotor symptoms. Furthermore, a study aimed at investigating the correlations between perceived stress and depression with spiritual health showed a significant negative correlation between them. PMW with better spiritual health had lower levels of stress and depression (34). According to this finding, the need to pay attention and provide strategies to improve the spiritual health of PMW will be a useful and effective solution to reduce the MSs in these women.

The study’s findings also demonstrated a negative correlation between HR and urogenital symptoms of menopause. Research has suggested that women tend to perform less treatment-seeking and self-care behaviors in the field of diseases related to the urogenital system. Women may feel ashamed or afraid of being alone and lacking support when facing these problems, which makes them pay less attention to such problems (35-37). The severity of urinary infections can affect the severity of urinary incontinence, and since urinary infections are induced by a lack of hygiene and attention to health, it can be inferred that HR may lead to a decline in urogenital symptoms (38). Consistent with our finding, a significant negative correlation was revealed between HR and MSs in other studies (39,40). Given the significance of HR in mitigating MSs and the importance of addressing urinary-genital symptoms, it would be beneficial to provide women with the necessary training in this area. This can aid in reducing some of the SMs among PMW.

Likewise, our findings revealed a negative correlation between IR and menopausal psychological symptoms. Additionally, Naworska and colleagues’ study (41) conducted on both peri- and PMW found that participating in social groups can reduce the severity of psychological symptoms and depression. Perceived social support, especially from important individuals such as spouses, has a positive effect on menopausal experiences and contributes to the reduction of mental, physical, and emotional complications (42). Based on these results, increasing the awareness of the family and people surrounding menopausal and middle-aged women who are approaching menopause regarding the importance of improving interpersonal relationships and supporting women, as well as encouraging women’s participation in social activities can aid in reducing MSs in women.

The findings also showed a significant negative relationship between SM and physical, psychological, and urogenital symptoms, as well as the total MS score. Other studies have also reported that higher stress can influence MS experience (43,44). However, in the survey performed by Bahri et al (45), no significant correlation was found between the intensity of MSs and depression and anxiety among menopausal women. This result is not congruent with the current study’s findings. In a survey conducted on 160 women between the ages of 45-55, it was discovered that high levels of stress, anxiety, and depression, low social support in terms of both quantity and quality, and not having a positive attitude towards menopause are all related to the severity of MSs (46). As mentioned, women must receive adequate training on MSs beforehand to reduce their stress and anxiety levels. Moreover, educational programs are required to educate women on stress reduction methods and ways to adapt to their changing conditions.

In the current study, MSs were significantly higher among women with chronic diseases, which is consistent with those reported in the previous studies (47-49). MSs, including somatic, psychological, and urogenital symptoms may interact with chronic disease symptoms. Therefore, more studies are required to investigate the impacts of chronic diseases on MSs. In addition, women with chronic diseases need to adopt a healthier lifestyle than other women.

The current study faced several limitations. First, the study’s cross-sectional design cannot establish causation or comprehend the evolution of the relationship between HPBs and MSs among PMW. Therefore, future studies can be conducted to discover and confirm the association between HPBs and different factors, and it is imperative to exercise prudence when making broad assertions about the findings. Additionally, since the entirety of the data gathered in this investigation relies solely on self-reported accounts, there exists the potential for socially desirable response bias to influence the provided answers.


Conclusion

We found a significant correlation between HPBs and their dimensions with MSs. Additionally, a significant relationship was observed between chronic diseases and MSs. The study concludes that paying attention to HPBs is crucial during menopause, and women should familiarize themselves with the dimensions of a healthy lifestyle and be informed about applying HPB strategies to control symptoms and complications of menopause. Furthermore, more research is needed regarding the interaction between chronic diseases and MSs. Health education intervention strategies represent a set of alternative approaches aimed at enhancing women’s attitudes and managing the symptoms related to menopause.


Acknowledgments

The authors would like to convey their appreciation to the officials of Neyshabur healthcare centers for their participation, the postmenopausal women, and the Neyshabur Students Research Committee.


Authors’ Contribution

Conceptualization: Shayesteh Shirzadi, Soudabeh Zarvekanloo, Zahra Rahimi.

Data curation: Shayesteh Shirzadi, Soudabeh Zarvekanloo, Zahra Rahimi, Zahra Arab Borzu.

Formal analysis: Zahra Arab Borzu.

Funding acquisition: Shayesteh Shirzad.

Investigation: Soudabeh Zarvekanloo, Zahra Rahimi.

Methodology: Shayesteh Shirzadi, Zahra Arab Borzu.

Project administration: Shayesteh Shirzadi.

Resources: Shayesteh Shirzadi.

Software: Shayesteh Shirzadi, Soudabeh Zarvekanloo, Zahra Rahimi, Zahra Arab Borzu.

Supervision: Shayesteh Shirzadi.

Validation: Shayesteh Shirzadi, Zahra Arab Borzu.

Visualization: Shayesteh Shirzadi, Soudabeh Zarvekanloo, Zahra Rahimi, Zahra Arab Borzu.

Writing–original draft: Soudabeh Zarvekanloo, Shayesteh Shirzadi, Zahra Rahimi, Zahra Arab Borzu.

Writing–review & editing: Shayesteh Shirzadi.


Competing Interests

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.


Ethical Approval

This study was accepted by the Ethics Committee of Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences (Ethics Code: IR.NUMS.REC.1401.005).


Funding

This study was supported by the Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences (Students Research Committee).


References

  1. Ilankoon I, Samarasinghe K, Elgán C. Menopause is a natural stage of aging: a qualitative study. BMC Womens Health 2021; 21(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-01164-6 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  2. World Health Organization (WHO). Menopause. WHO; 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/menopause. Updated October 17, 2022. Accessed July 19, 2023.
  3. Ko SH, Kim HS. Menopause-associated lipid metabolic disorders and foods beneficial for postmenopausal women. Nutrients 2020; 12(1):202. doi: 10.3390/nu12010202 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  4. Johnson A, Roberts L, Elkins G. Complementary and alternative medicine for menopause. J Evid Based Integr Med 2019; 24:2515690x19829380. doi: 10.1177/2515690x19829380 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  5. Shim S, Park KM, Chung YJ, Kim MR. Updates on therapeutic alternatives for genitourinary syndrome of menopause: hormonal and non-hormonal managements. J Menopausal Med 2021; 27(1):1-7. doi: 10.6118/jmm.20034 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  6. Scavello I, Maseroli E, Di Stasi V, Vignozzi L. Sexual health in menopause. Medicina (Kaunas) 2019; 55(9):559. doi: 10.3390/medicina55090559 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  7. Moudi A, Dashtgard A, Salehiniya H, Katebi MS, Razmara MR, Jani MR. The relationship between health-promoting lifestyle and sleep quality in postmenopausal women. Biomedicine (Taipei) 2018; 8(2):11. doi: 10.1051/bmdcn/2018080211 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  8. Rathnayake N, Lenora J, Alwis G, Lekamwasam S. Prevalence and severity of menopausal symptoms and the quality of life in middle-aged women: a study from Sri Lanka. Nurs Res Pract 2019; 2019:2081507. doi: 10.1155/2019/2081507 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  9. Ganapathy T, Al Furaikh SS. Health-related quality of life among menopausal women. Arch Med Health Sci 2018; 6(1):16-23. doi: 10.4103/amhs.amhs_122_17 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  10. Dąbrowska-Galas M, Dąbrowska J, Ptaszkowski K, Plinta R. High physical activity level may reduce menopausal symptoms. Medicina (Kaunas) 2019; 55(8):466. doi: 10.3390/medicina55080466 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  11. Jeong HG, Park H. Metabolic Disorders in Menopause. Metabolites 2022; 12(10):954. doi: 10.3390/metabo12100954 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  12. Sehhatie F, Mirghafourvand M, Momeni K. Health promoting behaviors among postmenopausal women in Langroud city, Iran. Int J Womens Health Reprod Sci 2015; 3(3):158-62. doi: 10.15296/ijwhr.2015.33 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  13. Kim IK, Choi HM, Kim MH. Menopausal knowledge and management in peri-menopausal women. J Korean Soc Menopause 2012; 18(2):124-31. doi: 10.6118/jksm.2012.18.2.124 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  14. Rindner L, Strömme G, Nordeman L, Hange D, Gunnarsson R, Rembeck G. Reducing menopausal symptoms for women during the menopause transition using group education in a primary health care setting-a randomized controlled trial. Maturitas 2017; 98:14-9. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.01.005 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  15. Walker SN, Sechrist KR, Pender NJ. The health-promoting lifestyle profile: development and psychometric characteristics. Nurs Res 1987; 36(2):76-81. [ Google Scholar]
  16. Nazari M, Farmani S, Kaveh MH, Ghaem H. The effectiveness of lifestyle educational program in health promoting behaviors and menopausal symptoms in 45-60-year-old women in Marvdasht, Iran. Glob J Health Sci 2016; 8(10):55414. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n10p34 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  17. Malik E, Sheoran P, Siddiqui A. Health-promoting behaviors and menopausal symptoms: an interventional study in rural India. J Midlife Health 2018; 9(4):200-6. doi: 10.4103/jmh.JMH_96_18 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  18. Mansikkamäki K, Raitanen J, Malila N, Sarkeala T, Männistö S, Fredman J. Physical activity and menopause-related quality of life - a population-based cross-sectional study. Maturitas 2015; 80(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.09.009 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  19. Beck V, Brewis J, Davies A. The remains of the taboo: experiences, attitudes, and knowledge about menopause in the workplace. Climacteric 2020; 23(2):158-64. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2019.1656184 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  20. Langer A, Meleis A, Knaul FM, Atun R, Aran M, Arreola-Ornelas H. Women and Health: the key for sustainable development. Lancet 2015; 386(9999):1165-210. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60497-4 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  21. Yazdkhasti M, Simbar M, Abdi F. Empowerment and coping strategies in menopause women: a review. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2015; 17(3):e18944. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.18944 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  22. Mohammadi Zeidi I, Pakpour Hajiagha A, Mohammadi Zeidi B. Reliability and validity of Persian version of the health-promoting lifestyle profile. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 2011;20(1):102-13. [Persian].
  23. Heinemann LA, Potthoff P, Schneider HP. International versions of the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS). Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 1:28. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-28 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  24. Allahverdipour H, Asghari Jafarabadi M, Burri A, Javadivala Z. The Persian version of Menopause Rating Scale (MRS): a psychometric study. Int J Womens Health 2020; 12:505-12. doi: 10.2147/ijwh.s249466 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  25. Yazdkhasti M, Simbar M, Abdi F. Empowerment and coping strategies in menopause women: a review. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2015; 17(3):e18944. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.18944 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  26. Kim MJ, Cho J, Ahn Y, Yim G, Park HY. Association between physical activity and menopausal symptoms in perimenopausal women. BMC Womens Health 2014; 14:122. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-122 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  27. Polat F, Aylaz R. The effect of exercise training based on the health promotion model on menopausal symptoms. Perspect Psychiatr Care 2022; 58(3):1160-9. doi: 10.1111/ppc.12917 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  28. Soori M, Kolivand M, Salari N, Bakhshi N. Investigating the relationship between physical activity and menopausal symptoms in postmenopausal women. J Health 2021; 12(1):84-93. doi: 10.52547/j.health.12.1.84.[Persian] [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  29. Ross K. Nutritional management of surgically induced menopause: a case report. Womens Health (Lond) 2021; 17:17455065211031492. doi: 10.1177/17455065211031492 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  30. Barnard ND, Kahleova H, Holtz DN, Del Aguila F, Neola M, Crosby LM. The Women’s Study for the Alleviation of Vasomotor Symptoms (WAVS): a randomized, controlled trial of a plant-based diet and whole soybeans for postmenopausal women. Menopause 2021; 28(10):1150-6. doi: 10.1097/gme.0000000000001812 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  31. Grigolon RB, Ceolin G, Deng Y, Bambokian A, Koning E, Fabe J. Effects of nutritional interventions on the severity of depressive and anxiety symptoms of women in the menopausal transition and menopause: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Menopause 2023; 30(1):95-107. doi: 10.1097/gme.0000000000002098 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  32. Barrea L, Pugliese G, Laudisio D, Savastano S, Colao A, Muscogiuri G. Does Mediterranean diet could have a role on age at menopause and in the management of vasomotor menopausal symptoms? The viewpoint of the endocrinological nutritionist. Curr Opin Food Sci 2021; 39:171-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2021.02.018 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  33. Arab S, Borjali A, Meschi F, Kakavand A, Zakerihamidi M. Effectiveness of Gratitude meditation on menopausal vasomotor symptoms. Razi J Med Sci 2019; 26 (9): 130-141.[Persian].
  34. Sourinejad H, Kazemi A, Adib Moghaddam E, Jani Ghorban M, Raisi Dehkordi Z, Mansourian M. The relationship between depression and perceived stress with spiritual health in postmenopausal women in Isfahan. J Clin Nurs Midwifery 2020;9(1):616-23. [Persian].
  35. Hadizadeh-Talasaz Z, Khadivzadeh T, Ebrahimipour H, Khadem Ghaebi N. Explaining facilitators and barriers to treatment-seeking in women with pelvic organ prolapse: a qualitative study. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil 2019; 22(3):16-31. doi: 10.22038/ijogi.2019.13387.[Persian] [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  36. Hale S, Grogan S, Willott S. “Getting on with it”: women’s experiences of coping with urinary tract problems. Qual Res Psychol 2009; 6(3):203-18. doi: 10.1080/14780880701876882 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  37. Ghazanfarpour M, Kaviani M, Abdolahian S, Bonakchi H, Najmabadi Khadijeh M, Naghavi M. The relationship between women’s attitude towards menopause and menopausal symptoms among postmenopausal women. Gynecol Endocrinol 2015; 31(11):860-5. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2015.1056138 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  38. Shouhani M, Rasouli F, Haji Amiri P, Hasanpour Dehkordi A, Mahmoudi M. Evaluation of the urogenital problems of menopausal woman referred to the health care centers of Ilam, Iran. Hormozgan Med J 2009;13(3):189-96. [Persian].
  39. Abo Ali EA, Oka AA. Menopausal symptoms and health-promoting lifestyle behaviors among women in Tanta, Egypt: an analytic cross-sectional study. Egypt Fam Med J 2021; 5(1):125-40. doi: 10.21608/efmj.2021.34033.1037 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  40. Ozcan H. Healthy life style behaviors and quality of life at menopause. Int J Caring Sci 2019; 12(1):492-500. [ Google Scholar]
  41. Naworska B, Brzęk A, Bąk-Sosnowska M. The relationship between health status and social activity of perimenopausal and postmenopausal women (health status and social relationships in menopause). Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(22):8388. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228388 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  42. Shariat Moghani S, Simbar M, Dolatian M, Nasiri M. The relationship between perceived social support and women experiences in menopause. Adv Nurs Midwifery 2016;25(90):55-64. [Persian].
  43. Sood R, Kuhle CL, Kapoor E, Thielen JM, Frohmader KS, Mara KC. Association of mindfulness and stress with menopausal symptoms in midlife women. Climacteric 2019; 22(4):377-82. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2018.1551344 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  44. Nosek M, Kennedy HP, Beyene Y, Taylor D, Gilliss C, Lee K. The effects of perceived stress and attitudes toward menopause and aging on symptoms of menopause. J Midwifery Womens Health 2010; 55(4):328-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.09.005 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  45. Bahri N, Afiat M, Aghamohamadian HR, Delshad Noughabi A, Bahri N. Investigating the relationship between severity of menopausal symptoms and depression, anxiety and other menopausal symptoms. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil 2013; 16(43):14-20. doi: 10.22038/ijogi.2013.639.[Persian] [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  46. Bauld R, Brown RF. Stress, psychological distress, psychosocial factors, menopause symptoms and physical health in women. Maturitas 2009; 62(2):160-5. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.12.004 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  47. Wang L, Zhang R, Yang Y, Sun X, Zhang B, Zhu H. Severity and factors of menopausal symptoms in middle-aged women in Gansu province of China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Womens Health 2021; 21(1):405. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01531-x [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  48. Fernández-Alonso AM, Cuadros JL, Chedraui P, Mendoza M, Cuadros AM, Pérez-López FR. Obesity is related to increased menopausal symptoms among Spanish women. Menopause Int 2010; 16(3):105-10. doi: 10.1258/mi.2010.010029 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  49. Al-Musa HM, Ahmed RA, Alsamghan AS, Abadi S, Al-Saleem MA, Abdu A. The prevalence of symptoms experienced during menopause, influence of socio-demographic variables on symptoms and quality of life among women at Abha, Saudi Arabia. Biomed Res 2017; 28(6):2587-95. [ Google Scholar]