Peer Review Guidelines
Journal of Education and Community Health as a member of UMSHA Press Journals, published by Hamadan University of Medical Sciences (UMSHA) Press, is committed to apply double-blind peer reviewing process, based on the COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers and ICMJE's Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals.
Peer Review Process
The decision to publish a paper is based on an editorial assessment and peer review. Initially all papers are assessed by an editorial committee consisting of 2 or more members of the editorial team. The prime purpose is to decide whether to send a paper for peer review and to give a rapid decision on those that are not.
Editorials and Letters may be accepted at this stage but in all other cases the decision is to reject the paper or to send it for peer review. Papers which do not meet basic standards or are unlikely to be published irrespective of a positive peer review, for example because their novel contribution is insufficient or the relevance to the discipline is unclear, may be rejected at this point in order to avoid delays to authors who may wish to seek publication elsewhere.
Occasionally a paper will be returned to the author with requests for revisions in order to assist the editors in deciding whether or not send it out for review. Authors can expect a decision from this stage of the review process within 1–2 weeks of submission.
Manuscripts going forward to the review process are reviewed by members of an international expert panel. All such papers will undergo a double blind peer review by two or more reviewers, under supervision of the journal section editor and also the Editor-in-Chief. We take every reasonable step to ensure author identity is concealed during the review process but it is up to authors to ensure that their details of prior publications etc. do not reveal their identity. Authors who reveal their identity in the manuscript will be deemed to have declined anonymity and the review will be single blind (i.e. authors do not know reviewers' identities).
We aim to complete the review process within 4 weeks of the decision to review although occasionally delays do happen and authors should allow at least 6 weeks from submissions before contacting the journal. The Editor-in-Chief reserves the right to the final decision regarding acceptance. You may find the journal’s article reviewing procedure, here.
Competing Interests
Peer reviewers must keep any information regarding the identity of the authors and the content of the manuscript confidential.
Peer review comments should be objective and constructive without being of a hostile or derogatory nature.
Further information on ethical peer review issues and competing interests can be found in the COPE guidelines.
Peer Reviewers
List of reviewers 2023
List of reviewers 2021
List of reviewers 2020
List of reviewers 2019
List of reviewers 2018
List of reviewers 2017
List of reviewers 2016
List of reviewers 2015
List of reviewers 2014